We shall attention our interest towards relationship anywhere between matchmaking apps play with and sociodemographic services and you will character results
The newest analyses have been performed having Roentgen 4.0.0 (R Foundation to own Mathematical Calculating, Vienna, Austria) . No missing study was in fact contained in our very own database. The new unlock database and you will code files of these analyses are available within Open Science Framework repository (
Table step one
Age, measured in years. Men: dummy variable where women = 0 and men = 1. Single: dummy variable where in a relationship = 0 and single = 1. Sexual minority: dummy variable where heterosexual = 0 and sexual minority = 1. ––– = Mean and standard deviation for apps use groups are not reported as this variable was nominal with three levels. Bold meet-an-inmate values correspond to statistically significant associations (p < 0.05).
Nonusers: participants stated that have never made use of matchmaking apps. Prior users: players reported with utilized relationship software, however over the past 3 months. Newest pages: Users advertised with utilized dating apps during the last three months. Years, mentioned in years. Proportions by the line.
Of the participants, 71.5% (n = 1219) were nonusers, 15.8% (n = 270) were prior dating apps users, and 12.7% (n = 216) were newest users. All sociodemographic variables were associated with the dating apps users groups. With respect to gender, for women, the distributions by group was pnonuser = 0.75, pprevious = 0.15, and pcurrent = 0.10; for men, pnonuser = 0.65, pprevious = 0.17, and pcurrent = 0.18; ? 2 (2) = , p < 0.001, V = 0.12. For those in a relationship, pnonuser = 0.79, pprevious = 0.17, and pcurrent = 0.04; for single participants, pnonuser = 0.65, pprevious = 0.15, and pcurrent = 0.20; ? 2 (2) = , p < 0.001, V = 0.24. For heterosexual participants, pnonuser = 0.79, pprevious = 0.13, and pcurrent = 0.08; for sexual minority participants, pnonuser = 0.55, pprevious = 0.23, and pcurrent = 0.23; ? 2 (2) = , p < 0.001, V = 0.25. Age was associated with the dating apps users groups, with previous users being the older ones (M = , SD = 2.16) and nonusers the youngers (M = , SD = 1.98), F(2, 1702) = , p < 0.001, R = 0.24.
Personality means differed by dating apps users group for all considered variables (all ps ? 0.017), except for Extraversion, F(2, 1702) = 0.00, p = 0.998. All effect sizes could be considered as rather small (MR = 0.07, range [.00, 0.10]). The higher associations were with respect to Open-Mindedness (higher mean for current users) and Conscientiousness (higher mean for nonusers). We note that Conscientiousness and Dark Core showed a high negative correlation (r = –0.59, p < 0.001).
Results of the multinomial logistic regression models are shown in Table 3 . The explanatory capacity of the model was moderate (Nagelkerke’s pseudo-R 2 = 0.25, McFadden’s pseudo-R 2 = 0.14). The explanatory ability was basically provided by the sociodemographic information. Being a member of a sexual minority greatly increased the probability of dating apps use (ORprevious = 3.08, p < 0.001; ORcurrent = 4.11, p < 0.001). Men had a higher probability of use (ORprevious = 1.44, p = 0.029; ORcurrent = 1.71, p = 0.002). Increments in age were associated with increments in the probability of use (ORprevious = 1.42, p < 0.001; ORcurrent = 1.27, p < 0.001). Being single showed a very interesting result, as it had an an important impact on the probability of being a current user (ORcurrent = 6.48, p < 0.001), but not with being a previous user (ORprevious = 1.22, p < 0.177). To better understand the relevance of these variables, we computed the probability of belonging to each group for an 18-year-old heterosexual woman in a relationship and for a 26-year-old single non-heterosexual man (both with mean scores in all personality variables). For that woman, pnonuser = 0.95, pprevious = 0.04, and pcurrent = 0.01; for that man, pnonuser = 0.12, pprevious = 0.45, and pcurrent = 0.44. All of the personality scores showed statistically non-significant coefficients (ORs in the range [0.86, 1.19], ps ? 0.058), except for Open-Mindedness with current use (ORprevious = 1.22, p = 0.026).